Volume 4, Issue 2, June 2019, Page: 44-53
Forecasting Realized Volatility Dynamically Based on Adjusted Dynamic Model Averaging (AMDA) Approach: Evidence from China’s Stock Market
Ping Yuan, Antai College of Economics & Management, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
Received: Apr. 25, 2019;       Accepted: Jun. 2, 2019;       Published: Jun. 20, 2019
DOI: 10.11648/j.ijafrm.20190402.11      View  117      Downloads  24
Abstract
In this study, we forecast the realized volatility of the CSI 300 index using the heterogeneous autoregressive model for realized volatility (HAR-RV) and its various extensions. Our models take into account the time-varying property of the models’ parameters and the volatility of realized volatility. The adjusted dynamic model averaging (ADMA) approach, is used to combine the forecasts of the individual models. Different from DMA method, the least and second least probability of particular models are excluded from the process of averaging the forecasts across the different models when using ADMA method. Our empirical results suggest that ADMA can generate more accurate forecasts than DMA method and alternative strategies. Models that use time-varying parameters have greater forecasting accuracy than models that use the constant coefficients. Time-varying parameter (TVP) models can generate more accurate forecasts than constant coefficient models in China’s stock market. The robustness test also indicates that the prediction accuracy of these DMA and ADMA models based on different parameters is higher than that of most single models, which further proves the effectiveness of the multi-model realized volatility prediction model based on dynamic averaging method in the prediction effect. These findings indicate the importance of considering parameter change and model specification change in volatility forecasting.
Keywords
CSI 300 Index, Realized Volatility, Adjusted Dynamic Model Averaging, Time-varying Parameters
To cite this article
Ping Yuan, Forecasting Realized Volatility Dynamically Based on Adjusted Dynamic Model Averaging (AMDA) Approach: Evidence from China’s Stock Market, International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Risk Management. Vol. 4, No. 2, 2019, pp. 44-53. doi: 10.11648/j.ijafrm.20190402.11
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Wang et al. (2016). Forecasting realized volatility in a changing world: A dynamic model averaging approach. Journal of Banking & Finance, 64, 136-149.
[2]
Amihud, Y., & Mendelson, H. (2006). Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread. Journal of Financial Economics, 17 (2), 223-249.
[3]
Amihud, Y., & Mendelson, H., Wood R., (1990). Liquidity and the 1987 stock market crush. Journal of Portfolio Management, 44, 65-69.
[4]
Andersen, T. G., Bollerslev, T., (1998). Answering the skeptics: Yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts. International Economic Review, 39 (4), 885-905.
[5]
Andersen, T. G., Bollerslev, T., Diebold, F. X., Labys, P., (2003). Modeling and forecasting realized volatility. Econometrica, 71 (2), 579-625.
[6]
Andersen, T. G., Bollerslev, T., Diebold, F. X., (2007). Roughing it up: Including jump components in the measurement, modeling, and forecasting of return volatility. Review of Economics and Statistics, 89 (4), 701-720.
[7]
Andersen, T. G., Bollerslev, T., Diebold, F. X., H. Ebens, (2001). The Distribution of Realized Stock Return Volatility. Journal of Financial Economics, 61, 43–76.
[8]
Andersen, T. G., Bollerslev, T., Meddahi, N., (2011). Realized volatility forecasting and market microstructure noise. Journal of Econometrics, 160 (1), 220-234.
[9]
Asquith, Paul & Pathak, Parag A. & Ritter, Jay R., (2005), Short interest, institutional ownership, and stock returns, Journal of Financial Economics, 78 (2), 243-276.
[10]
Barndorff-Nielsen, O. E., et al. (2008). Designing realized kernels to measure the ex post variation of equity prices in the presence of noise. Econometrica, 76 (6), 1481-1536.
[11]
Barndorff-Nielsen, O. E., Shephard, N., (2006). Econometrics of testing for jumps in financial economics using bipower variation. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 4 (1), 1-30.
[12]
Barndorff-Nielsen, O. E., Shephard, N., (2004b). Power and bipower variation with stochastic volatility and jumps. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 2 (1), 1-37.
[13]
Corsi, F., (2004). A simple approximate long-memory model of realized volatility. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 7 (2), 174-196.
[14]
Corsi, F., Pirino, D., Reno, R., (2010). Threshold bipower variation and the impact of jumps on volatility forecasting. Journal of Econometrics, 159, 276-288.
[15]
Corsi, F., Reno, R., (2012). Discrete-time volatility forecasting with persistent leverage effect and the link with continuous-time volatility modeling. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 30, 368–380.
[16]
Patton, A. J., (2011). Data-based ranking of realized volatility estimators. Journal of Econometrics, 161 (2), 284-303.
[17]
Patton, A. J., Sheppard, K., (2015). Good volatility, bad volatility: Signed jumps and the persistence of volatility. Reviews of Economics and Statistics, 97 (3), 683-697.
[18]
Ping, Yuan, Li, et al. (2018). Forecasting realized volatility based on the truncated two-scales realized volatility.
[19]
Zhang, L., Mykland, P. A., Aït-Sahalia, Y., (2005). A tale of two time scales: Determining integrated volatility with noisy high-frequency data. Journal of American Statistical Association, 100 (472), 1394-1411.
[20]
Calvet, L. E., Fisher, A. J., (2004). How to forecast long-run volatility: regime switching and the estimation of multifractal processes. Journal of Financial Econometrics 2, 49–83.
[21]
Hamilton, J. D., Susmel, R., (1994). Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity and changes in regime. Journal of Econometrics 64, 307–333.
[22]
Raftery, A. E., Kárny, Miroslav, & Ettler, P. (2010). Online prediction under model uncertainty via dynamic model averaging: application to a cold rolling mill. Technometrics, 52 (1), 52-66.
[23]
Hibon, M., Evgeniou, T., (2004). To combine or not combine: selecting among forecasts and their combinations. International Journal of Forecasting 21, 15–24.
[24]
Liu, C., Maheu, J. M., (2009). Forecasting realized volatility: a Bayesian model averaging approach. Journal of Applied Econometrics 24, 709–733.
[25]
Scheinkman, J. A. and Xiong, W. (2004) Overconfidence and Speculative Bubbles. Journal of Political Economy, 111, 1183-1219.
[26]
Giampiero M. Gallo, Barbara Pacini. (2000). The effects of trading activity on market volatility. European Journal of Finance, 6 (2), 163-175.
[27]
Figlewski, S. (1981). The informational effects of restrictions on short sales: some empirical evidence. Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis, 16 (4), 463-476.
[28]
Figlewski, S., & Webb, G. P. (1993). Options, short sales, and market completeness. Journal of Finance, 48 (2), 761-777.
[29]
Boehmer, E., Huszar, Z. R., & Jordan, B. D. (2010). The good news in short interest. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 96 (1), 80–97.
[30]
Boehmer, Ekkehart, and Julie Wu, (2010). Short selling and the informational efficiency of prices. Working paper, Texas A&M University.
[31]
Boehmer, E., Huszar, Z. R., Wang, Y., & Zhang, X. (2017). Are shorts equally informed? a global perspective. Social Science Electronic Publishing.
[32]
Deo, R., C. Hurvich, and Y. Lu, (2006). Forecasting Realized Volatility Using a Long-Memory Stochastic Volatility Model: Estimation, Prediction and Seasonal Adjustment. Journal of Econometrics, 131, 29–58.
[33]
Hansen, P. R., Lunde, A. and Nason, J. M. (2011). The model confidence set. Econometrica, 79, 453-97.
Browse journals by subject